Landing Page Audit Google Ads Audit Creative Scoring Guides Get in touch

Google Ads Quality Score Low? How to Improve It

Quality Score is a diagnostic, not a KPI — but a keyword with weak quality signals will typically cost materially more per click than the same keyword with strong signals, at equivalent positions. This guide covers what each component actually measures, how to find the problem in your account, and the specific fixes that move the dial on Expected CTR, Ad Relevance, and Landing Page Experience.

Quick answer

To improve Google Ads Quality Score, identify which component is rated Below average: Expected CTR, Ad Relevance, or Landing Page Experience. Fix Expected CTR with stronger intent-matched headlines and negative keywords. Fix Ad Relevance by restructuring ad groups around tighter keyword themes. Fix Landing Page Experience with faster, dedicated landing pages that match the ad’s promise. Quality Score is diagnostic — fix the component, not the number.

Quality Score affects what you pay, not just where you rank

Ad Rank determines your position in each auction. It is calculated from your bid, the quality of your ad and landing page, Ad Rank thresholds, competition, search context, and the expected impact of your assets. Quality is not a single number in that formula — it is a real-time assessment Google makes for every auction. The 1–10 Quality Score in your Keywords table is a diagnostic approximation of that quality signal, not the auction input itself.

What the diagnostic tells you matters commercially. Older PPC training explains the quality-cost relationship with a simplified model: your cost is roughly the Ad Rank of the advertiser below you divided by your own quality factor. That model is useful for understanding the direction of travel — better quality can lower the bid needed to compete for the same visibility — but it is a teaching model, not the live Google Ads formula. Real auctions also factor in thresholds, competition, search context and asset impact. The table below illustrates the principle: a keyword with stronger quality signals costs less per click than a lower-quality competitor bidding more.

Bidding up can buy visibility, but it does not fix a low-quality keyword. Fix the quality first where the economics do not work.

Quality score in the auction
Advertiser Max CPC Ad Rank* Actual CPC Position
You — QS 8 £2.00 16 £1.44 #1
Competitor A — QS 5 £3.00 15 £2.25 #2
Competitor B — QS 3 £2.50 7.5 £1.50 #3
* Simplified. Real Ad Rank includes six factors. Example illustrates the quality-efficiency relationship — higher QS means lower cost for the same position. Competitor A bids 50% more and still ranks below you.

The three components — what each one measures

Every Quality Score is built from three components, each rated Above average, Average, or Below average relative to other advertisers showing for the same searches. A Below average rating on any component tells you something specific about where the problem is.

The three components
Component What it measures What Below average means Where to start
Expected CTR Likelihood your ad is clicked when shown for the search query Ad copy is not compelling or relevant enough to earn clicks at the same rate as competitors Rewrite headlines to match query intent. Add negatives to remove low-CTR impressions.
Ad Relevance How closely your ad matches the intent behind the user’s search Ad copy is too generic or the ad group mixes keywords with different intents Tighten ad group structure. Write headlines that address the shared intent of all keywords in the group.
Landing Page Experience Usefulness and relevance of the page people land on after clicking Page is too generic (homepage traffic), loads slowly on mobile, or doesn’t deliver on the ad’s promise Dedicated landing pages per ad group. Match the H1 to the ad. Fix mobile load speed.
Quick diagnosis
What you see Likely cause First fix
QS 3/10 + Expected CTR Below average Ads are not winning clicks — copy doesn’t match query intent Rewrite headlines and add negative keywords
QS 4/10 + Ad Relevance Below average Mixed-intent keywords in the same ad group Split keywords by intent into tighter ad groups
QS 5/10 + Landing Page Exp. Below average Page mismatch, slow mobile load, or homepage traffic Improve message match and mobile speed
Low QS but strong CPA/ROAS Smart Bidding compensating — QS may not be the priority Check performance before intervening
Dash instead of a score Not enough exact-match impression data yet Wait for impression volume to accumulate

How to find your Quality Score in Google Ads

Quality Score is not visible by default. You need to add it to the Keywords table manually.

Navigate to Campaigns › Keywords. Click the columns icon at the top right of the table, then select Modify columns for keywords. Under the Quality Score section, add:

  • Quality Score — the 1–10 composite
  • Exp. CTR — Expected CTR component rating
  • Ad Relevance — Ad Relevance component rating
  • Landing Page Exp. — Landing Page Experience component rating

Once visible, sort by Quality Score ascending. Work through keywords showing Below average on any component — that is where the fixes are.

A dash () in the Quality Score column means there is insufficient exact-match impression data to calculate a score. This is normal for low-volume or new keywords. You cannot directly improve a dash — only time and accumulated impressions will generate a score.

01

How to fix Below average Expected CTR

Expected CTR is Google’s prediction of how likely your ad is to be clicked when shown for a specific search query. It is benchmarked against other advertisers showing for the same exact queries. Below average means Google expects your ad to receive fewer clicks than competitors — not that your historical CTR is low, but that it is predicted to be. That prediction is weighted by your account’s own click history on the keyword: a keyword with a poor historical record carries that footprint even after you improve the copy, and needs both better ads and time for the score to reset.

The most direct lever is your ad copy. Headlines that reflect the searched query raise click prediction because they signal relevance to the user. Generic headlines — “Marketing Agency London”, “Quality Products Online” — match no specific intent and score poorly against competitors who have written to the exact query.

Fix: Rewrite Headline 1 in your Responsive Search Ads to directly reflect the query intent. Use a call-to-action that matches what the searcher wants to do (“Get a Quote” for service intent, “Shop Now” for transactional, “See How It Works” for informational). Add negative keywords to exclude queries where a click is unlikely — irrelevant impressions weaken expected CTR signals because the keyword accumulates a history of low-click auctions against those queries. Run regular search term audits and exclude irrelevant match expansions before they accumulate.

Generic headline
“Marketing Agency London”
No query match. Could belong to any advertiser in the category.
Query-matched headline
“Google Ads Management — London”
Reflects what was searched. Signals relevance before the click.
02

How to fix Below average Ad Relevance

Ad Relevance measures how closely your ad matches the intent behind the search query. It scores poorly when there is a gap between what someone searched for and what your ad says. The most common cause is ad group structure: too many keywords with different intents forced into the same group, served by the same set of ads.

If your ad group contains “buy running shoes”, “are running shoes good for hiking”, and “running shoe care tips”, no single set of ads can be highly relevant to all three. The commercial buyer, the curious researcher, and the existing owner are different audiences with different intents.

Fix: Group keywords with near-identical intent into the same ad group — 5 to 15 closely related terms is a workable target. The headline in your RSA should address the intent shared by all keywords in that group. For high-value exact match keywords with significant impression volume and competitive CPCs, a dedicated ad group gives you full control over the message. The underlying principle is that tight groupings make it possible to write genuinely relevant ads; loose groupings make it structurally impossible.

Mixed-intent ad group
buy running shoes
are running shoes good for hiking
running shoe care tips
running shoe reviews 2026
One ad cannot match all four intents. At least two keywords will produce Below average Ad Relevance.
Tightly themed ad group
buy running shoes
running shoes buy online
order running shoes uk
running shoes free delivery
All four keywords share transactional intent. One RSA can be written to address all of them without diluting relevance.
03

How to fix Below average Landing Page Experience

Landing Page Experience reflects how relevant and useful your landing page is to people who click your ad. Google’s crawlers assess the page for usefulness of content, ease of navigation, and whether it delivers on what the ad promised. A poor rating here almost always means one of three things: the page is too generic for the query, it loads too slowly, or it performs poorly on mobile.

Sending paid traffic to a homepage is the most common structural mistake. The homepage serves too many audiences and too many goals. The user who clicked an ad for “emergency boiler repair London” does not want to navigate through a services menu. A dedicated landing page with a single message and a single conversion action is the correct structure — and it performs better on this component because it unambiguously matches the ad.

Fix: Match the landing page to the specific ad. The primary keyword should appear in the H1. The offer or service promised in the ad should be the first thing visible on the page. Use PageSpeed Insights (pagespeed.web.dev) to check mobile performance — Google assesses mobile and desktop separately, so a fast desktop page does not compensate for a slow mobile one. For lead generation pages, put the form or call-to-action above the fold on a 375px screen. The page must load quickly, deliver on the ad’s promise, and make the next action obvious. For a full audit of message match, CTA strength and mobile speed scoring, run the free landing page audit.

Message match
The ad’s promise must match the page’s opening
Ad copy
“Emergency Boiler Repair London — Same Day”
Landing page
Homepage with a services menu and about us section
Mismatch — user must navigate to find what the ad promised
Ad copy
“Emergency Boiler Repair London — Same Day”
Landing page
Dedicated page: H1 “Emergency Boiler Repair — Same Day in London”, phone number prominent, booking form above fold
Match — page confirms the ad’s promise immediately

The six mistakes that keep Quality Score low

Most Quality Score problems are structural — they are baked into how the account was set up, not just how the ads were written. Fixing individual keywords one at a time is less effective than identifying which of these structural issues applies and fixing it at the root.

Fix immediately
Structural — affects every keyword
!Broad match without negative keywords
!Homepages as landing pages for specific ad copy
!Mixed-intent keywords in the same ad group
Fix this week
Copy and relevance issues
!Generic headlines with no query match
!Slow or non-mobile-optimised landing pages
Stop doing this
Misuse of the metric
!Chasing 10/10 as a campaign objective
2026 Context

Quality Score and Smart Bidding are increasingly decoupled.

In accounts running broad match with Smart Bidding, a keyword can sit at QS 3–4 while the campaign hits CPA or ROAS targets. Smart Bidding adjusts bids per auction in real time — it can deprioritise low-quality auctions automatically and still convert efficiently on the ones where signals align. The visible QS reflects exact-match impression history, not the full spread of queries the broad match keyword is actually serving.

Quality Score remains most meaningful for exact and phrase match keywords in competitive auctions, where QS most accurately reflects what you are paying relative to competitors. In a well-optimised broad match campaign hitting conversion targets, a low QS number is a diagnostic signal — worth investigating, but not a reason to intervene if performance is healthy.

Quality Score also does not apply to Shopping or Performance Max campaigns. In Shopping, quality signals exist in Google’s ad serving system but are not surfaced as a visible score. In PMax, the relevant quality levers are asset group quality and conversion signal quality — not keyword-level QS. If Smart Bidding is underperforming despite a structurally sound account, conversion tracking quality is usually the first thing to check — not Quality Score.

FAQ

As a practical rule of thumb, 7–10 is usually healthy, 5–6 suggests room for improvement, and 1–4 deserves investigation. But the component ratings matter more than the composite number. A keyword at 5 with only Landing Page Experience below average needs a different fix from a keyword at 5 with Expected CTR below average. Focus on which component is rated Below average rather than the composite score in isolation.
No. The 1–10 Quality Score metric exists only for Search campaign keywords. Shopping and Performance Max campaigns have no keyword structure to score against, so the Quality Score column is unavailable for those campaign types. Quality signals still influence how Google serves ads in these campaigns, but they are not surfaced as a visible score.
Quality Score is influenced by recent historical performance, so changes take time to appear. A meaningful ad copy or landing page improvement may take 2–4 weeks to register, depending on impression volume. High-volume keywords show movement faster than low-volume terms. Track direction using the historical Quality Score column — add it alongside the live score to see week-over-week movement.
Yes, particularly in accounts running broad match with Smart Bidding. Smart Bidding adjusts bids per auction in real time based on conversion signals — it can limit spend on low-quality queries and still hit CPA or ROAS targets. A keyword may show QS 3 while the campaign converts efficiently. Quality Score is most meaningful as a cost indicator for exact and phrase match keywords where the QS calculation most accurately reflects auction reality.
Ad Rank determines your position in each auction and is calculated in real time from six factors: your bid, quality of your ad and landing page, Ad Rank thresholds, auction competitiveness, search context, and expected impact of assets. Quality Score is a keyword-level diagnostic that approximates the quality component — but it is not directly used in the auction. Google is explicit: the visible 1–10 number is not an input into real-time Ad Rank.
Lewis Phillips
Lewis Phillips Performance marketer · 11 years

I’ve managed Google Ads accounts across e-commerce and lead generation — including accounts where a structural Quality Score fix reduced CPC materially without a bid change. This guide draws on that, not a summary of Google’s help centre.

LinkedIn →
Ready to check yours?

Run the audit. See what’s actually going on.

Free · Read-only · No agency pitch